Taxon Description

Urytalpa dorsalis (Staeger, 1840)

General Description

Diagnostic Description

This species comes closest to U. trivittata and U. atriceps in shape of the terminalia, but differs by having the thoracic stripes darker and fused in males. The gonostylus is small, tapered and claw-like in lateralview, retracted and directed dorsad to the extent that it is almost totally hidden in ventral view. Such a small, retracted gonostylus is also found in U. trivittata and U. sapporoensis (Okada, 1938).This is the only Nordic species of Urytalpa where the male abdomen due to the extra large anterior extension of the aedeagal apparatus appears distinctly petiolated and laterally compressed. The female can be separated from U. trivittata and U. macrocera by the combination of a short ovate sessile cercus, sternite VIII having convex apicomedial corners with a larger setose excavation, and by having globular spermathecae with thick inner wall.

Morphology

Male (n=5). Body length 6–9, 7.5 (n=7) mm. Wing length 4.46–6.02, 5.24 mm, or3.28–3.44, 3.36 as long as profemur. Antenna length 2.18–2.48, 2.32 mm.

Coloration (specimen in alcohol). Head dark brown, mouthparts and palps pale yellowish. Antenna dark brown, scape, pedicel and basal part of first flagellomere pale. Thorax brown with antepronotum pale; preepisternum 2 with darker lower half; laterotergite with darker posteroventral part; mesonotal stripes dark, almost completely fused,separated anteriorly; humeral area pale, extending laterally to behind wing base. Wings clear, yellow tinged,veins brown. Halter pale. Legs pale whitish yellow. Abdomen dark brown with variable amount of yellow;tergites I–V usually with large triangular apicolateral yellow marking; tergites VI–IX darker, with at most small yellow patches laterally on tergites VI–VII; sternites I–VI pale; terminalia dark brown.

Terminalia. (Fig) Gonocoxites fused ventrally by a broad connection; apically with a short apicomedial outgrowth without strong setae. Large hypandrial lobe forming thin hyaline plate ventromedially. Gonostylus retracted into gonocoxite, small and claw like in lateral view with the tip pointing apicoventrally. Aedeagal apparatusvery large, with compressed plate large and tall, extending anteriorly into segment V, and long associated apodemes laterally. Tergite IX without outgrowths, apical corner with patch of short internal setae; with shallow posterior and deep anterior U-shaped incision. Proctiger small and short, cercus oblong in lateralview.

Female (n=2). Body length 7.5 mm. Wing length 5.68–5.9 mm, or 3.38–3.6 as long as profemur. Antennalength 1.75 mm.

Coloration. Thorax usually all yellow without dark markings; abdomen variablefrom all dark to entirely yellow; otherwise as in male.

Terminalia. Cercus short ovate andsessile. Sternite VIII with convex corners, with a large excavation apicomedially covered with short stiff setae. Spermathecae globular, spermathecae and ducts with thick inner walls.

Distribution

Widespread in Europe; recorded from Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark,Finland, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Netherlands, Norway, Poland,Romania, Russia (NET), Slovakia, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland.

Urytalpa galdes Hedmark & Kjaerandsen, 2009

General Description

Diagnostic Description

This species is closest to U. chandleri Bechev & Koç, 2008 in the shape of the male terminalia but is easily distinguished from all other species by the long club-shaped and gently incurved processes arising caudally from the gonocoxites and by the large gonostylus with a single long and digitate apical process. It appears distinctly smaller than the other Nordic species of Urytalpa and the male abdomen is dorsoventrally rather than laterally compressed 

Morphology

Male

Coloration (specimen in alcohol). Head brown with pale yellowish mouth parts. Antenna dark brown with basal part of first flagellomere pale. Thorax mainly brown; prescutum pale brown on anterior half; preepisternum pale on dorsal half; laterotergite pale on anteriorpart; mediotergite gradually darker towards posterior end; thoracic stripes dark blackish brown narrowly surrounded by pale yellow ground; humeral area pale, narrow pale stripe extending laterally along entirelength of mesoscutum. Wings clear, yellow tinged, veins brown. Halter whitish. Legs whitish. Abdomenmainly dark brown; tergites II–V with apical half forming yellow bands; sternites yellow with thin dark bandsbasally.

Terminalia (Fig.). Gonocoxites divided ventrally, with long club-shaped and gently incurved process apicolaterally and short setose lobe medially. Hypandrial lobe not discernible, apparently absent or very hyaline. Gonostylus large, with a rounded lateral knob and a long digitate apical process. Aedeagal apparatus of medium length, medial compressed plate not high but extending distinctly beyond apex of the stout lateral apodeme. Tergite IX without outgrowths, apical corner rounded, without patch of short internal setae; with deep posterior and shallow anterior U-shaped incision. Proctiger relatively long; cercus parallelogram shaped in lateral view.

Female unknown

Size

Male (n=2). Body length 4.5–5.5 (n=3) mm. Wing length 3.9–3.92 mm, or 3.5–3.55 as long as profemur. Antenna length 2.24–2.26 mm.

Female unknown

Distribution

Northern Europe; so far known only from the type locality in northern Sweden.

Rymosia balachowskyi Matile, 1969

General Description

            Rymosia balachowskyi   Matile, 1969: 246, fig. 6

This small species was described based on a single male collected in Iran and has to my knowledge not been reported again. Original illustrations indicate very lose relationship to Rymosia bifida from which it at best can be segregated by the more slender and curved median branch of the gonostylus. Matile (1969) did not relate it to Rymosia bifida but rather suggested close relationship to Rymosia signatipes and Rymosia setiger. The holotype has been examined but the terminalia (stored in glycerine in a microvial) was unfortunately found to be fragmented and extremely paled, the gonostyles were searched for in vain. The rest of the holotype is pinned and in good condition and closely resembles Rymosia bifida. Synonymy with Rymosia bifida cannot be excluded.

Specimens examined: IRAN: Assalem (Forét), 32°25'40"N, 053°41'17"E, 3 Jul 1965 (Leg: L. Matile) — holotype male (MNHN, JKJ-SPM-011659).

Tribe Exechiini

Phylogeny

Tagged discussion on the delimitation and characterization of the tribe Exechiini copied from Tuomikoski 1966:159-164  (Generic taxonomy of the Exechiini (Dipt., Mycetophilidae)):

The subfamily Mycetophilinae, as delimited by  Edwards (1925), is a nicely homogeneous and no doubt monophyletic grouping. Edwards divided it into two tribes, as follows: • Anepisternal and pteropleural bristles absent; hind coxa with a fairly strong bristle at base; empodia absent or rudimentary; hind tibial comb usually indefinite or absent; tibial bristles short (Tribe Exechiini) • Anepisternal bristles present; hind coxa usually without basal bristle; empodia and hind tibial comb nearly always distinct (Tribe Mycetophilini)

According: to Edwards, the tribe Exechiini comprises the genera Anatella, Rhymosia, Exechia, Allodia, and Brachypeza; in the tribe Mycetophilini he included the genera: Cordyla, Trichonta, Phronia, Dynatosoma, Mycetophila, Epicypta, Platurocypta, Delopsis, Zygomyia, and Platyprosthiogyne.

Subsequent writers, on the whole, have accepted this division without further comment. However, Freeman (1951, p. 88), when describing a new Mycetophilinae genus from southern South America, suggested that a revision of the tribal limit might be necessary: »Pleurogymnus, gen. n., is interesting because its characters are such as to cast some doubt upon the validity of the two tribes. It is possible that a future reclassification of the subfamily will abolish the tribes and show that some genera such as Trichonta require redefining.» Furthermore, he says (op. c., p. 93): »It is, therefore, probable that the two tribes require a redefinition on characters other than those used by Edwards (1925)

The words »usually» and »nearly always» in the above cited key of Edwards indicate that the distinguishing characters are not absolutely correlated. In doubtful cases, the author appears to have regarded the absence or presence of anepisternal bristles as decisive. In fact, this is one of the best diagnostic characters, but not absolutely reliable. In many of the Exechiini the mesanepisternum is completely devoid of any kind of macrotrichia, whereas in others at least a part of it is covered with small setulae. In Cordyla some of these macrotrichia are true bristles, not smaller than in the typical Mycetophilini; in consequence the genus was placed by Edwards in the latter tribe, though in other respects it is rather close to some Exechiini, such as Brachypeza. On the other hand, Pleurogymnus FREEM. and Pseudalysiinia TONN. do not belong to the Exechiini in spite of their bare mesanepisternum.

Neither is the presence of a single strong dark basal bristle on the hind coxae an absolute criterion, though it is a useful additional character of the Exechiini. The basal bristle is weak or absent in some Anatella species; many other Exechiini, especially of the compound genera Rymosia and Brachypeza, have two basal bristles (the upper one mostly shorter), and in Cordyla the basal bristle is sometimes replaced by a cluster of a few shorter bristles. A similar, though less conspicuous, patch of tiny bristles also occurs in the Mycetophilini (at least in Mycetophila fungorum); in Trichonta and Dynatosoma the presence of a basal bristle (though usually rather weak and pale in colour) is a common feature.

Nevertheless, the Exechiini are a natural group and can be sharply delimited by other characters. Two of them were not used by Edwards, viz. the absence of a long sagittal line on the head and the shape of the mesothoracic katepistemum. These two features are especially useful, because they seem to be absolutely correlated with each other and with the reduction of the empodium.

Freeman (op. cit.) pointed out that the furrowing of the head along the sagittal suture in Pleurogymnus, in correlation with other characters, places this genus close to some species of Trichonta (Mycetophilini) rather than to the Exechiini, where, in view of the absence of mesanepistemal bristles, it would seem to belong. I have checked this head character for a large number of Mycetophilinae, and found no exception to the rule that the Mycetophilini have a distinct median line extending from the middle ocellus to the highest point of the head, while the Exechiini at most show a short stump of this furrow above the insertion of the antennae at the site of the rudimentary median ocellus. As the presence of a long sagittal line on the head is the rule in other Mycetophilidae (Sciophilinae, of Edwards), its absence in the Exechiini is to be considered an apomorphic character.

In the Exechiini, the lower part of the mesothoracic katepistemum is rounded and somewhat dilated in a characteristic way to cover the base of the middle coxa (see figs. 34–37 in Shaw & Shaw 1951). In the Mycetophilini the lower margin of the katepisternum usually has a distinct anterior angle (figs. 38–41 in Shaw & Shaw) and hardly overlaps the base of the middle coxa; a similar shape of the katepistemum is typical of all other fungus gnats except for the Exechiini which, accordingly, are apomorphic in this respect as well. In one group of Mycetophilini showing a pronounced dorsiventral depression of the whole thorax, the katepisternum is also different, but in another way than in the Exechiini: it is very low and horizontal (figs. 42–43 in Shaw & Shaw) without a distinct anterior angle. The rounded dilation of the lower border of the katepisternum in the Exechiini is probably connected with the peculiar position of the middle legs in repose. Edwards
(1921 b, p. 23) has studied the resting postitions of the Mycetophilinae and found that the Exechiini (Exechia, Rymosia, Allodia, Brachypeza and Cordyla) »all raise their middle legs high above the body, the tarsi being curved towards each other so that they almost meet»

No member of the Mycetophilini is known to have this capacity.

The larval and pupal characters are too insufficiently known to be used in the delimitation of the Exechiini. According to Madwar (1937), the larvae of the two tribes of the Mycetophilinae may readily be told apart by examining the locomotory pads, which are well developed in the Mycetophilini and poorly developed in the Exechiini, though there are exceptions to this rule.

Considering the diagnostic characters and their variation, the Exechiini may be distinguished from other Mycetophilinae (i.e., the Mycetophilini, of Edwards) as follows: 

 

Exechiini:

• Sagittal furrow of the head only indicated by a short stump above the insertion of the antennae at the site of the middle ocellus

• Mesanepisternum bare, or with small short macrotrichia, with true bristles only in Cordyla and Neallodia

• Lower part of the mesothoracic katepisternum with an evenly rounded dilation overlapping the base of the middle coxa; middle legs raised above the body in resting position

• Hind coxa usually with a single strong dark basal bristle, sometimes accompanied by a shorter one, or with a small cluster of shorter basal bristles (Cordyla spp.), rarely basally bare (Anatella spp.)

• Tip of hind tibia on the posterior surface usually with a dense field of decumbent setulae; the end bristles below it not forming a pronounced comb

• Empodium rudimentary

 

Other Mycetophilinae:

• Sagittal furrow of the head long, extending above the site of the middle ocellus close to the highest point of the head 

• Anepisternum with bristly macrotrichia, except in Pleurogymnus and Pseudalysiinia

• Lower border of katepisternum with distinct anterior angle, not distinctly covering the base of the middle coxa, or else katepisternum low and horizontal and the thorax dorsiventrally flattened; middle legs not raised in repose

• Base of hind coxa without a long and dark basal bristle; if a strong one is present (Trichonta spp., Dynatosoma spp.), it is usually pale in colour

• Tip of hind tibia on the posterior surface without such a dense field of setulae; the end bristles in a more definite comb-like row

• Empodium small but well developed 

The revised delimitation of the Exechiini conforms with that of Edwards with the one exception that Cordyla belongs to the Exechiini and not to the Mycetophilini. Of the later described genera Neallodia EDW., as suggested by Edwards, comes near Cordyla, and thus belongs to the Exechiini.

The Exechiini are characterized by some features which, when compared with the situation in the other Mycetophilidae, must be considered apomorphic, thus offering proof of the monophyletic nature of the tribe. Such are at least the reduction of the empodium and of the sagittal furrow of the head, and the shape of the lower part of the katepistemum in connexion with the resting position of the middle legs. This delimitation of the Exechiini leaves the Mycetophilini characterized mainly by the corresponding plesiomorphies and accordingly not easy to establish as monophyletic. In fact, the tribe Mycetophilini may be a paraphyletic grouping, the Exechiini representing only one specialized branch of it. There is rather strong evidence that one group of genera of Mycetophilini, viz. Mycetophila and its allies (Zygomyia, Sceptonia, Epicypta, etc.) with their strong tibial bristles and bristly mesepimeron, constitute a monophyletic group, and that the peculiar Tasmanian genus Pseudalysiinia TONN., with tibial setulae and wing microtrichia not arranged in lines, perhaps represents a »sister group» of all the other known Mycetophilinae (including Exechiini), whereas the remaining genera (Pleurogymnus, Phronia, Zygophronia, Trichonta and Dynatosoma) appear in a certain way to be more related to each other. Thus, in addition to the Exechiini, three tribes might be recognized. However, these questions fall outside the scope of the present study, and for the present there appears to be no need of nor sufficient evidence for a further division of the Mycetophilini.

Introduction to the genera of Exechiini (Tuomikoski 1966:163)

While the delimitation of the Exechiini as a natural and monophyletic group thus presents no serious difficulties, its current division into genera is far from satisfactory, and the problems involved not easy to solve. The present-day generic division of the tribe dates back to Winnertz (1864), whose genera have been accepted practically unaltered by the more modem writers, including DZIEDZICKI, JOHANNSEN, LUNDSTROM, EDWARDS, and LANDROCK. The only exceptions are that Brachycampta WINN. is considered to be a synonym of Allodia WINN., and that one new exotic genus Neallodia EDW. has been added.

Winnertz based the genera nowadays included in the Exechiini mainly on the venation, which is rather monotonous in the whole subfamily, with only comparatively small deviations from the general rule, such as the length of the cubital fork, cu2, and the anal vein. Other characters have only occasionally been utilized.

It is apparent that genera based on single trivial venational features showing poor correlation, if any, with other characters often do not represent natural, still less monophyletic, units. A closer study indicates that this is actually true of some of the genera of Exechiini. Exechia WINN. is probably a partially polyphyletic grouping held together by a single convergent feature, the shortness of the cubital fork. Rymosia WINN., in turn, appears to be paraphyletic, being based on venational characters that are plesiomorphic compared with the situation in Exechia and Allodia. Allodia WINN., again, seems to be paraphyletic insofar as a portion of it perhaps stands closer to one part of Rymosia, whilst another part seems to exhibit a closer relationship to Brachypeza and Cordyla than to the former. Brachypeza WINN. is not quite homogeneous either, since one part of it is different enough to make a close relationship doubtful. Thus of the old Winnertzian genera, only Anatella and Cordyla seem to be properly delimited monophyletic genera.

In the present author's opinion, the current generic system of the Exechiini, however convenient for practical pigeon-holing, cannot meet the demands of a natural taxonomy such as is required, for example, for zoogeographical purposes (see HENNIG 1960). The question is how to master the situation in the present imperfect state of our knowledge.

According to our present knowledge, the Exechiini appear to be mainly of Holarctic distribution and perhaps also origin, and comparatively poorly represented in the tropics and in the Southern Hemisphere, or at least without any greatly deviating or really original types there. It is felt, therefore, that the situation as regards the generic taxonomy of the tribe can be judged in its essential points from a regionally limited material from the main area of the group. The safest step forward seems to be a sharper delimitation and characterization of the smaller units within Exechia, Rymosia, Allodia and Brachypeza as they are seen in the better known European material, a work which was already initiated by the earlier authors, especially Edwards. However, those subdivisions only too often show affinities crossing the customary generic boundaries. This suggests that while more conservative workers may prefer to treat the smaller groups at most as subgenera of the traditional Winnertzian genera, the future aim should perhaps be to group them in a new, more natural way into larger genera irrespective of the customary generic limits. It is not intended to embark on the latter task in the present study. The smaller units are treated as genera in the hope that such a method of dealing with them will at least have the advantage of directing attention to the neglected characters and affinities. In some cases the subgeneric status is employed if the genus in question appears reasonably monophyletic, or simply as a provisional solution in an especially imperfectly clarified case. Of course, a study like the present, being based on but a limited number of the species described, cannot claim to be a final or authoritative contribution to these questions. However, it appears by no means too early to take the more than hundred year old system of the Winnertzian genera under review, and it always facilitates discussion if we provide names for the natural groups which, at least in part, are already familiar to specialists. 

A representative collection from Finland, put together in 1962-1965 mainly by Dr. WALTER HACKMAN and the present author, served as the main material for the study. To this was added the other collections in the Entomological Museum of the University of Helsinki, and a fairly comprehensive material from northern Burma, collected by Dr. René Malaise in 1934. During a visit to the British Museum (N. H.) some additional extra-European material was superficially studied.

As to the lists of species included in the genera and subgenera, no completeness was aimed at beyond the Finnish fauna, the study being a preparatory one for an account of the Finnish Mycetophilidae. New combinations are proposed only for species actually studied or more rarely for those which, on grounds of adequate published descriptions and figures, are easy to place. 

Urytalpa trivittata (Lundström, 1914)

General Description

Diagnostic Description

Most similar to U. dorsalis but differs by having more slender and less petiolated and less laterally compressed abdomen and by having the thoracic stripes distinctly separated. The larger apicomedial outgrowth of the gonocoxite with 5–6 strong setae in a row is a distinctive character for this species. Urytalpa dorsalis and U. trivittata differ from the other Nordic species in having gonocoxites without larger outgrowths and the gonostylus is retracted dorsally into the gonocoxites. In U. trivittata, however, the gonostylus is subtriangular in lateral view and somewhat larger. The female can be separated from U. dorsalis and U. macrocera by the combination of an oblong and petiolated cercus, sternite VIII having truncated apicomedial corners with a narrow setose excavation, and by having distinctly ovate spermathecae with a relatively thin inner wall.

Morphology

Male

Coloration (specimen in alcohol). Head brown with mouth parts paler. Antenna brown, scape, pedicel and basal part of first flagellomere paler. Thorax yellow with pale antepronotum; dark brown mesonotal stripes distinctly separated,narrowly surrounded by pale yellow ground; humeral area pale, extending laterally to behind wing base. Wings clear, yellow tinged, veins brown. Halter pale. Legs slightly paler than thorax. Abdomen brown;tergites I–V with narrow pale bands apically; tergites VI–IX dark brown; sternites I–V pale; terminalia yellowish brown.

Terminalia (Fig.). Gonocoxite connected ventrally by a narrow strip only; apically with a distinct apicomedial outgrowth with 5–6 strong setae in a row (A). Large hypandrial lobe forming thin hyaline plate ventromedially (A). Gonostylus retracted into gonocoxite, small and subtriangular in lateral view with the tip pointing dorsally (D). Aedeagal apparatus long but not high, with less compressed plate extending anteriorly into segment V, and long associated apodemes laterally. Tergite IX without outgrowths, apical corner pointed ventrally, without patch of short internal setae; with shallow posterior and deep anterior U-shaped incision (B). Proctiger small and short, cercus broadly ovate in lateral view (A).

Female.

Coloration. As in male with dark brown mesonotal stripes distinctly separated.

Terminalia (Fig.). Cercus oblong and petiolated (A.). Sternite VIII with truncated corners, with a narrow excavation apicomedially covered with short stiff setae. Spermathecae distinctly ovate, spermathecae and ducts with medium thick inner walls (B.).

Size

Male (n=5). Body length 6.5–8.5, 7.1 (n=10) mm. Wing length 5.14–5.88, 5.5 mm, or3.24–3.64, 3.39 as long as profemur. Antenna length 2.2–2.64 (n=4) mm.

Female (n=1). Body length 7.5 mm. Wing length 6 mm. Antenna length 1.82–1.86 mm.

Distribution

European; with scattered records only from Finland, Germany, Italy, Norway and Sweden.Possibly boreal-mountainous with main distribution in northern parts of the boreal zone.

Urytalpa macrocera (Edwards, 1913)

General Description

Diagnostic Description

The long slender antenna, uniform dark brown coloration, and rounder wing with shorter R-Mvein fusion easily distinguishes this species from the other members of the genus. Thelong slender apical projection of the gonocoxites is shared only with U. galdes, sp. n. but mostother structures of the male terminalia are unique and distinct, including the large spoon shaped projectionlaterally from tergite IX with a dense brush of long setae internally. The female can be separatedfrom U. trivittata and U. dorsalis by the short, truncated abdomen and by having globularspermathecae with thin inner walls and thin ducts.

Morphology

Male

Coloration (specimen in alcohol). Head dark brown, mouth parts brown. Antenna brown with basal part of first flagellomere pale.Thorax dark brown; thoracic stripes dark brown, diffusely separated; humeral area brown. Wings clear, yellowtinged, veins paler brown than in other species. Halter whitish. Legs brown. Abdomen uniformly dark brown.

Terminalia (Fig.). Gonocoxites divided ventrally, with long slender projection. Hypandrial lobe tongue shaped and curved dorsally. Double "bladder shaped" aedeagal guides situated above the gonocoxite. Gonostylus long and slender, subrectangular in lateral view with the apicodorsal corner slightly elongated. Aedeagal apparatus short and small compared to other species, with compressed plate extending only slightly beyond apex of the stout and short lateral apodeme. Tergite IX with large spoon shaped projection laterally and with large dense brush of long setae internally, with deep posterior and shallow anterior U-shaped incision. Proctiger small and short, cercus sessile, broadly ovate in lateral view.

Female

Coloration. Overall brown as in male.

Terminalia (Fig.).Tergites VIII and IX weakly sclerotized apically in front of cercus. Cercus sessile and ovate (A.). Sternite VIII divided ventrally, with slightly truncated corner, with a narrow excavation apicomedially covered with short stiff setae (B.). Spermathecae globular, spermathecae and ducts with thin inner walls (A.).

Size

Male (n=5). Body length 6.5–8.5, 7.79 (n=7) mm. Wing length 5–6.72. 5.83 mm, or3.74–4.15, 3.89 as long as profemur. Antenna length 2.84–3.9 (n=4) mm.

Female (n=3). Body length 5–5.5 mm. Wing length 4.04–4.08 mm, or 3.29–3.54 as long as profemur. Antenna length 1.62–1.7 mm. 

Distribution

Western Europe; known only from northern Britain (Scotland and northern England),France, Norway, Sweden and The Netherlands.

Urytalpa atriceps (Edwards,1913)

General Description

Diagnostic Description

This species shares terminalia with fused gonocoxites and very long aedeagal apparatus with U. dorsalis and U. trivittata. It can be distinguished from these and other species by having long, digitateprojections from tergite IX and relatively large and exposed gonostyli. The shape of the bifidgonostylus is unique with a brush of strong setae on the inner smaller branch

Morphology

Male

Coloration (dry, pinned specimen). Head dark blackish brown with pale yellowishbrown mouth parts and palps. Antenna dark brown; scape, pedicel and basal part of first flagellomere paleryellow. Thorax yellow with mediotergite dark brown; preepisternum with brown posterior part and anterioredge; thoracic stripes brown, narrowly surrounded by pale yellow ground, humeral area pale, extending laterally to behind wing base. Wings clear, yellow tinged. Halter yellow. Legs yellow. Abdomen yellow withtergites VI–IX dark brown, sternites VII–VIII brownish yellow.

Terminalia (Fig.). Gonocoxites connectedby a narrow strip and prolonged apicolaterally (A). Gonostylus bifurcate, with a broad base; ventral branch strong,ending in a sclerotized fold; dorsal branch shorter with about 5 long strong setae forming a brush apically (D) . Aedeagal apparatus long but not high, with compressed plate extending anteriorly into segment V, and long associated apodemes laterally. Tergite IX with a long, narrow, digitate projection apicolaterally without patchof short internal setae; with deep posterior and anterior U-shaped incision (B&C). Proctiger small and short, cercus thin, rhombic in lateral view (B&C).

Female unknown.

Size

Male (n=1). Body length 6 mm. Wing length 4.84 mm or 3.36 as long as profemur. Antenna length 2.26 mm.

Female. Unknown

Distribution

North-western Europe; known only from southern England, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden.

Urytalpa vicina (Brunetti, 1912)

General Description

Description based on Brunetti, 1912:  Diptera Nematocera (excluding Chironomidae and Culicidae).

Diagnostic Description

Female. This species is considerably like Platyura marginata, differing essentially in the much darker thorax with still darker stripes; the shoulders being pale yellowish and conspicuous. The scutellum and metanotum are also dark shining brown; the abdominal bands are wider than in P. marginata.The basal segment is wholly dark brown.

Size

Length 4 mm.

Pseudexechia Tuomikoski, 1966

General Description

The text is based mainly on Kjærandsen (2009): The genus Pseudexechia Tuomikoski re-characterized, with a review of European species (Diptera: Mycetophilidae).

The genus Pseudexechia () was established by  Tuomikoski (1966) for a small group of closely related species in the tribe Exechiini, segregated from Exechia Winnertz by the absence of discal bristles on the mesoscutum (F), ovate clypeus (E) and distinctive features of the male terminalia such as the bud-like hypandrial lobe (B) (Chandler 1978, Kjærandsen & Chandler 2006). Staeger (1840) described the first species of Pseudexechia as Mycetophila trivittata Staeger, 1840. Zetterstedt (1852) then described a pale form of M. trivittata, later illustrated by Lundström (1909) and now known as Pseudexechia aurivernica Chandler, 1978 (Chandler 1978, Kjærandsen 2005).

Tuomikoski (1966) included seven species in Pseudexechia, six European, one North American and one Afrotropical. He designated Exechia trisignata Edwards, 1913, described from Scotland, as the type species and noted that he had seen several undescribed species from Europe and Asia in the collections at the Zoological Museum, University of Helsinki, Finland. At present 26 species are associated to Pseudexechia (): 16 are known from the Holarctic region (Tuomikoski 1966Chandler 1978, Ostroverkhova 1979, Zaitzev 1982, Zaitzev 1988Ostroverkhova & Stackelberg 1988Chandler & Blasco-Zumeta 2001, Zaitzev 2003, Kjærandsen & Chandler 2006, Kjærandsen et al. 2007Kjærandsen 2009), 3 are known from the Oriental region (Kjærandsen 1994, Kallweit & Martens 1995, Wu & Yang 2003) and 7 are known from the Afrotropical region (Matile 1971, Kjærandsen 1994). However, several further species from the Afrotropical, the Oriental and the eastern Palaearctic regions await description and a few that are described in other genera probably belong to Pseudexechia.

Biology

Little is known about larval habitats of Pseudexechia. P. trisignata s. l. has been reared from soft gill fungi like Naucoria sp. and Galerina sp. (Chandler 1993) and Psathyrella piluliformis (Sasakawa & Ishizaki 1999). P. tristriata has been reared from Thelephora terrestris (Yakovlev 1994). P. trivittata has been reared from fruiting bodies of coprophilous agarics like Coprinus, Psathyrella and Panaeolus (Jakovlev et al. 2008). Kjærandsen (2009) mainly reported Pseudexechia collected with aspirator in caves in wintertime (55%) (see Kjærandsen 1993), with window traps (29%) or with sweep net (10%). It is noteworthy that although large Malaise trap collections have been examined in search of Pseudexechia, only about 1% of the examined material originates from Malaise trap collections. This under-representation in Malaise trap collections seems to hold for several of the Exechiini genera, and might be explained by a general negative phototaxis for many members of the tribe.

Diagnostic Description

The text is based on Kjærandsen (2009):

 

Species of the genus Pseudexechia are medium sized to small, slender exechiines, body length 3.5–6.5 mm (). They can be recognized by the combination of the following characters: Ovate clypeus (A&E). Vestigial, but usually traceable median ocellus (distinct but reduced in size in the trisignata group, A). Absence of distinct bristles on the mesoscutal disc, except along the margin (F) and sometimes one pair posteriorly. Wings () with vein sc more or less distinctly ending in R1, Cu branching beyond level of M branching (with one exception, see Kjærandsen 1994), M-petiole subequal in length to cross vein ta (ratio 0.87–1.56, 1.16, n=65), branches of M and Cu without setulae. Male terminalia characteristic; usually with a strongly sclerotized, bud-like hypandrial lobe with a small median split (e.g. Fig. 6A), ventral branch of gonostylus always with one long and one shorter, whip-like seta basally, often with a few characteristically fan-tipped setae ventrally (A), tergite IX without pair of extra long, apically truncated bristles (Fig. 6C), and pseudocercus slender and distinctly articulated (B, 6C). Female terminalia with sclerotized postgenital plate (), usually with one-segmented (e.g. Fig. 6D), but sometimes two-segmented () cerci. 

Look Alikes

Key to European males of Pseudexechia

1 Terminalia large, stout (Fig. 6A); dorsal branch of the gonostylus with a characteristically smooth whitish apex; ventral branch forming a thin plate shaped more or less like a spatula (Fig. 6B); hypandrial lobe heavily sclerotized, bud-like by elaborate folding, triangular to subrectangular (Fig 6A) …… 2

- Terminalia more slender (Fig. 14A), with elongated dorsal and ventral branches of the gonostylus (Fig. 14B); hypandrial lobe narrow rectangular, forming parallel branches medially (Fig. 14A) …… trivittata-group 8

2 Median ocellus small, but distinctly present (Fig. 4A); vein R4+5 distinctly downcurved (C > D see A); hypandrial lobe stout, subrectangular (Fig. 6A) …… trisignata-group 3

- Median ocellus absent or at most tiny and vestigial; vein R4+5 almost straight (C ≤ D see D); hypandrial lobe conic, triangular (Fig. 9A) or enlarged and diverging apically (Fig. 11D) …… canalicula-group 5

3 A dull brown species with a distinct greyish dusting (A); hypandrial lobe with rounded corners (Fig. 6A); ventral branch of gonostylus with angular basodorsal corner making the spatula broadest basally (Fig. 6B); smooth whitish tip of dorsal branch of gonostylus evenly thick (Fig. 6B) …… Pseudexechia trisignata

- Moderately to distinctly bi-coloured species without greyish dusting; hypandrial lobe sharply pointed apically (Fig. 7A); ventral branch of gonostylus without angular basodorsal corner; smooth whitish tip of dorsal branch of gonostylus slightly dilated or constricted … 4

4 Broad pale band along whole margin mesonotum; ventral branch of gonostylus forming small, symmetric and round spatula (Fig. 7B); smooth whitish tip of dorsal branch of gonostylus slightly constricted (Fig. 7B) …… Pseudexechia pectinacea

- Without or at most narrow pale band along margin of mesonotum; ventral branch of gonostylus forming large, asymmetric spatula that is broadest apically (Fig. 8B); smooth whitish tip of dorsal branch of gonostylus slightly dilated (Fig. 8B) …… Pseudexechia tuomikoskii

5 Larger species, distinctly bi-coloured in dark greyish brown and yellow, with sharply defined mesonotal stripes (B) …… 6

- Smaller species, weakly bi-coloured to dull brown, with indistinct or fused mesonotal stripes …… 7

6 Gonostylus large, exposed (Fig. 9A); dorsal lobe distinctly dilated apically (Fig. 9B); ventral lobe forming large, slightly asymmetrical spatula (Fig. 9B) …… Pseudexechia canalicula

- Gonostylus small, retracted (Fig. 10A); dorsal lobe not dilated apically (Fig. 10B); ventral lobe forming narrow, angular boot-shaped spatula (Fig. 10B) …… Pseudexechia aurivernica

7 Hypandrial lobe enlarged, diverging apically (fig. 11A&D); dorsal lobe of gonostylus apically strongly dilated, campanulate (Fig. 11B); dorsointernal branch small (Fig. 11B); ventral branch narrow, angular boot-shaped (Fig. 11B) …… Pseudexechia monica

- Hypandrial lobe not enlarged, conic triangular (Fig. 12A); dorsal lobe of gonostylus apically dilated, but not campanulate (Fig. 12B); dorsointernal branch large (Fig. 12B); ventral branch forming medium sized spatula with acute angled apicodorsal corner (Fig. 12B) …… Pseudexechia parallela

8 Dorsal branch of gonostylus subrectangular, with sharply truncated, whitish tip (Fig 13A&B); dorsointernal branch forming narrow, elongated lamellate fan (Fig. 13B); hypoproct reduced, hyaline (Fig. 13C) …… Pseudexechia latevittata

- Dorsal branch of gonostylus oblong to lanceolate, without sharply truncated, whitish tip (Fig. 14A&B); dorsointernal branch reduced to hyaline knob basally on dorsal branch (Fig. 14B); hypoproct sclerotized, pointed (Fig. 14C) …… 9

9 A distinctly bi-coloured species in dark greyish brown and yellow, with sharply defined thoracic stripes and triangular pale bands on abdominal tergites; dorsal branch of gonostylus shorter and smaller than ventral branch which has medial surface covered with setae and no brush apically (Fig. 14B) …… Pseudexechia tristriata

- A dull brown species with fused, hardly discernible thoracic stripes and indistinct, narrow (if any) pale bands on abdominal tergites; dorsal branch of gonostylus longer than ventral branch which has medial surface devoid of setae but a narrow brush of strong setae apically (Fig. 15B) …… Pseudexechia trivittata

 

Key to European females of Pseudexechia (female of Pseudexechia monica is unknown)

1 Cercus two segmented (e.g. ) …… 2

- Cercus one-segmented (e.g. Fig 6D) …… 3

2 Tergite VII prolonged dorsally, with smooth, straight posterior edge; postgenital plate stout (Fig. 9D) …… Pseudexechia canalicula

- Tergite VII emarginated dorsally and smoothly convex laterally; postgenital plate with a more tapered apex (Fig. 12D) …… Pseudexechia parallela

3 Tergite VII with strongly dentate to laciniate posterior edge, widely excavated dorsally (Fig. 10D) …… Pseudexechia aurivernica

- Tergite VII with smooth or at most weakly dentate posterior edge …… 3

3 Apicolateral corner of tergite VII with nude area, cercus and postgenital plate in lateral view slender and pointed (Fig. 8D) …… trisignata-group 4

- Tergite VII evenly covered with setae; cercus and especially postgenital plate in lateral view broader and less stretched …… trivittata-group 6

4 A dull brown species with a distinct greyish dusting, usually without distinct pale bands on abdominal tergites; tergite VII widely but shallowly excavated dorsally, with rounded, weakly crenulated posterior edge; seta along apical margin long, slender (Fig. 6D) …… Pseudexechia trisignata

- Moderately to distinctly bi-coloured species in dark greyish brown and yellow, with a pale band along lateral side of mesonotum and distinct triangular pale bands on abdominal tergites; tergite VII not excavated dorsally, with almost straight and smooth posterior edge; seta along apical edge long, slender or short, stout …… 5

5 Seta along apical margin of tergite VII long, slender; sternite VIII with rounded apex (Fig. 7D) …… Pseudexechia pectinacea

- Seta along apical margin of tergite VII short, stout; sternite VIII subsquare, with truncated apex (Fig. 8D) …… Pseudexechia tuomikoskii

6 Tergite VII with distinctly pointed margin laterally; sternite VIII with pointed apex …… 7

- Tergite VII with smoothly rounded margin laterally; sternite VIII with truncated apex, appearing almost rectangular in lateral view (Fig. 13D) …… Pseudexechia latevittata

7 A dull brown species with fused, hardly discernible thoracic stripes and indistinct, usually narrow pale bands on abdominal tergites (Fig. 15D) …… Pseudexechia trivittata

- A distinctly bi-coloured species in dark greyish brown and yellow, with distinct, sharply defined thoracic stripes and broad, triangular pale bands on abdominal tergites (Fig. 14D) …… Pseudexechia tristriata


Morphology

Adults:

Head: Antenna (B&C) with 14 flagellomeres; scape and pedicel with a few close set stout bristles ventromedially and dorsally, otherwise with scattered small setae apically; flagellars long rectangular, densely covered with medium sized pale, decumbent setae, some short stiff setae along ventral side; scape, pedicel and half of first flagellar pale, rest of flagellum darker. Vertex with five strong orbital bristles, otherwise covered with medium sized, decumbent dark setae. Ocelli (A) three or two, lateral ocellus touching eye margin, median ocellus either small but distinct or vestigial but usually traceable. Frontal furrow reduced, not reaching frontal tubercle. Face (E) wide rectangular, with scattered small setae. Clypeus (E) long ovate to subcircular, covered with small setae. Palp (A&D) with four distinct palpomeres; sensory pit in third palpomere forming an ovate open furrow medially, with trichoid sensillae in internal sac; fifth palpomere as long as or longer than third and fourth palpomere combined.

Thorax (F). Proepisternum with 1–2 and antepronotum with 3 strong bristles. Scutum without distinct acrostichals and dorsocentrals, with strong prealar and postalar and sometimes with one pair of posteriorly situated bristles, otherwise covered with small to medium sized setae; with or without dark thoracic stripes on pale ground and pale band along lateral margin. Scutellum with one strong and one weaker pair of bristles otherwise covered with small setae. Anepisternum, anepimeron and preepisternum completely devoid of setae. Laterotergite scattered with tiny, thin setae and some large bristles. Mediotergite bare or at most with a couple of setae. Metepisternum posteriorly with a few bristles and some tiny setae. Metepimeron with some scattered tiny setae.

Wings (). Wing membrane unspotted yellowish tinted or with faintly smoked apical half and faint cloud around branching of media; with microtrichia only, trichia dark and arranged into regular rows apically. Basicosta with 1–2 strong bristles. Crossvein h without setae. Distal medial plate without setae both on dorsal and ventral side. Costa, R, R1and R5 with both dorsal and ventral setae. Sc, tb, ta, M, CuA, CuP, A1 and A2 without setae. Costa terminates at tip of R5. R4 absent. R5 straight to moderately curved posteriorly. Crossvein ta with small white spot. M-fork long, M-petiole subequal in length to crossvein ta (0.87–1.56, 1.16, n=65). CuA-fork shorter, starts (with one exception, see Kjærandsen 1994) distinctly beyond M-fork. CuP long and basally strong, fading out about at level of CuA branching. A1shorter, distinct and strong, breaking abruptly well before CuA-fork. A2 distinct, fading out about at level of A1.

Legs (F&G-J). Setosity dark. Fore coxa covered with small setae on anterior and lateral surface, anteriorly and apically with strong bristles. Mid coxa with narrow row of small setae anteriorly; bare basolaterally, apical third with narrow row of small setae laterally; apically with larger setae and some bristles. Hind coxa with one strong bristle basolaterally; with narrow row of small setae along posterolateral surface; apically with larger setae and some bristles. Femora uniformly covered with small setae. Tibiae with trichia in regular rows. Fore tibia with short anteroventral and posterior bristles, anteroapically with round depressed area, covered with trichia. Mid tibia with row of small, close set anterior bristles and a few posterior and posterodorsal bristles. Hind tibia with a few large anterior bristles; some large posterodorsal bristles; several small, close-set bristles in one row posterodorsally; tibial comb consisting of triangular area densely covered with long microtrichia posteroapical and complete transverse of setae along apical margin (J). Fore tarsus without distinct spine-like setae ventrally. Empodia (H) rudimentary, thread like.

Abdomen (). Pale abdominal markings present along posterior margin of tergites; more or less extended anteriorly to form larger triangular or complete pale areas laterally. Preterminal segments often darker than rest of abdomen.

Male terminalia (). Tergite IX medium sized, wide to long rectangular, more or less divided mesally, usually with sclerotized mesal suture; scattered with setae that get larger towards apicolateral corners, without any outstanding strong setae. Cercus small ovate knob; scattered with small, thin setae. Gonocoxite (B) large, moderately to deeply incised ventrally in which a usually bud-shaped, strongly sclerotized hypandrial lobe is situated; apically divided into an outer wall (section II) and a medioventral, inner wall (section III). Epiproct (B) pointed triangular, very hyaline, without setae. Hypoproct (B, 6C) usually forming long tapered posterior process, straight or downcurved. Lateral margin of tergite X forming slender, setose lobe (“pseudocercus”); clearly articulated against rest of segment; of variable length. Aedeagus (B) elongated, hyaline, tapered apically, well retracted within gonocoxite, basally jointed with strong gonocoxal apodemes. Aedeagal guides (B, 6A) large, hyaline lobes; rectangular or elongated; situated dorsolaterad of hypandrial lobe. Hypandrial lobe (Fig. 5B) well developed, usually bud-shaped, of medium size and strongly sclerotized; its angle in relation to gonocoxite variable, usually exposed and aligned with gonocoxite, sometimes retracted into gonocoxite and produced interodorsad; basolaterally with patch of placoid sensillae; with a small split apicomedially. Gonostylus divided into six branches (A). Dorsal branch short with smooth whitish rounded tip or moderately to extremely elongated; without blunt lamellae; lateral surface always covered with strong setae. Dorsointernal branch usually present as a fan-shaped outgrowth of the ventrointernal margin of the dorsal branch; with row of small, blunt lamellae along entire internal margin; without setae, sometimes reduced to bifurcated or small bare knob (Fig. 14B). Medial branch reduced, present as small to large knob, with a few setae. Ventral branch large, usually shaped as a thin spatulate plate, sometimes elongated, lanceolate; typically with a few characteristically fan-tipped setae ventrolaterally and some strong setae apicomedially. Anterior branch forming ventrally directed, subrectangular to triangular cushion; without setae, sometimes with numerous small, blunt projections caudally (Fig. 14B). Internal branch forming medium sized, bulbous, largely striated pouch; posteriorly with a few setae, sometimes with a small, digitate lobe (Fig. 14B).

Female terminalia (). Usually partly retracted within tergite VII. Tergite VIII well developed, subrectangular, devoid of setae. Sternite VIII large; ventrally scattered with small setae; fused with a well-developed, apically truncated or pointed gonocoxite VIII, bearing several strong setae along apical margin. Gonapophysis VIII present as hyaline tapered protrusion, usually extending beyond apex of gonocoxite VIII, without setae. Labia not discernible, or fused basally with gonapophysis VIII. Tergite IX well developed and partly fused with gonocoxite IX, without setae. Spermathecal duct ending in constricted, sclerotized eminence. Tergite X reduced or fused with epiproct. Sternite X apparently fused basally with gonapophysis IX; forming a stout, sclerotized, elongated postgenital plate; apically covered with small setae. Cercus one- or two-segmented, scattered with small setae; elongated to moderately truncate; apical segment when present short, ovate.

 

Larva unknown.

Size

Adults: Medium sized to small, slender with long legs and long abdomen (Fig. 2), body length 3.5–6.5 mm.

Phylogeny

Tuomikoski (1966) considered Pseudexechia to be more related to Allodiopsis and Allodia than to Exechia and Exechiopsis. In phylogenetic analyses based on morphological characters Rindal & Søli (2006) placed Pseudexechia as sister taxon to Tarnania, whereas Kjærandsen (2006) in a review of Tarnania and the Rymosia genus group, did not include Pseudexechia but found Rymosia and Pseudorymosia to be close relatives of Tarnania. The genus Pseudexechia was not included in the molecular studies presented so far, and it has shown difficult to get support for a rigid classification of the tribe Exechiini based on molecular data (Rindal et al. 2007, Rindal et al. 2009). Species of Pseudexechia show intrageneric variation in several characters that usually are constant (though not universally) on generic level in the Exechiini, such as presence/absence of the median ocellus, Cu-fork usually branching beyond, but sometimes before the M-fork (see Kjærandsen 1994), and female cercus being one- or two-segmented. The placement of Pseudexechia in relation to other genera of the tribe Exechiini is thus an intriguing and unsettled issue, and homology assessments of structures in their terminalia will hopefully add character systems aiding to solve intergeneric relationships within the tribe. A preliminary first step to organize characters from the terminalia within the entire Exechiini into a transformational framework is in progress but still pending better character definitions to form basis for a phylogenetic analysis. Kjærandsen (2009) restricted the classification to present four tentatively defined species groups for the World species of Pseudexechia (). The step forward will be to try to condense informative transformational signals from the preliminary analysis into fewer, more complex and independently evolving character systems (sensu Wheeler 2008), that hopefully, and with the aid of new molecular data (see Scotland et al. 2003), will bring new insights into the evolutionary history of the Exechiini.

Pseudexechia trisignata-group

General Description

Kjærandsen (2009) defined this species group where the species are mainly characterized by having vein R4+5 distinctly downcurved [R4+5-bending index 1.44–1.84, 1.66, n = 26, Fig. 3A), by having only one strong bristle on proepisternum, and by a number of characters in the male terminalia such as the stout, subrectangular hypandrial lobe; the dorsointernal branch of the male gonostylus forming a large, strongly asymmetric, blade-shaped fan with blunt lamellae along the margin; the ventral branch of the gonostylus being shaped like a spatula, and bearing less than five strong, characteristically fan-tipped setae ventrally. The pseudocercus is long and slender. The female terminalia has fused, slender, s-shaped cercus, and a long and slender, but sclerotized postgenital plate. The trisignata-group is distributed in the Holarctic and the Oriental regions and the included species are: P. inthanonensisP. pectinaceaP. trisignata, and P. tuomikoskii (Fig. 1).

Scratchpads developed and conceived by: Vince Smith, Simon Rycroft, Dave Roberts, Ben Scott...